Intercultural Communications and Global Social Existence: a cross cultural analysis of communication theory
Keywords:Semiosphere, Architectonic Methodology, Alterity, Consummatory, Global-local dialectics, Complementarity
AbstractAt the mid-point of the second decade of the 21st century humanity is on the verge of another revolutionary advancement and this leap in the progression of civilization is brought about by communication. However, what makes the current revolutionary paradigm shift unique is the extent to which it has created: global-local dialectics, global interdependence, and communication media are contributing to creating multi-levels of global networks that are rapidly advancing civilization to the global level. The shift to the technological age is accompanied by a convergence of global communication media. This convergence is exemplified by media, industries, and human interests (at multi-levels) becoming integrated. This makes a cross-cultural analysis of the semiotic nature of communication and of the impact of media on global social existence essential for creating theoretical insight into the role of media in shaping the future global experience. This article argues that a comparative analysis of the role of communication in shaping culture and the advancement of civilization indicates that the ontological nature of communication reflects a semiotic/dialectic (yin-yang) type dichotomy inherent in the nature of existence that can only be resolved by creating larger spheres of beneficial interactions.
Adorno, Theodor. (1985) Subject and Object. The Essential Frankfurt School Reader. (Arato, Andrew. & Gebhardt, Eike. Edits.) New York: The Continuum Publishing Company.
Aristotle. (2009) Aristotle: Rhetoric. (volume 3). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Al-Rodhan, Nayef. & Stoudmann, Gérard. (2008) Pillars of Globalization. Geneva: Editions Slatkine.
Ames, Roger. (2009) Becoming Practically Religious: A Deweyan and Confucian Context for Rortian Religiousness. Rorty, Pragmatism, and Confucianism. (Huang, Yong. Edit.). Albany, New York: The State University of New York.
Boynton, G. R. (1996) Our Conversations about Governing. Political Communication Research: Approaches, Studies, Assessments, Volume 2. (Paletz, David. Edit.). Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Castells, Manuel. (2008) The New Public Sphere: Global Civil Society, Communication Networks, and Global Governance. The Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science. 616, March, 78-93.
Chan, Alan. (2010) Religion in Early and Medieval China. (Chan, Alan. & Lo, Yuet-Keung. Edits.). Albany, New York: The State University of New York Press.
Chen, Guo-Ming. (2009) Toward an I Ching Model of Communication. China Media Research. Volume 3, Issue 3, 72-81.
Chan, Wing-Tsit. (1963) A Sourcebook in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Comte, Auguste. (2000) The Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte. (Martineau, Harriet. Trans.). Ontario: Batoche Books.
Chung-Ying, Cheng. (1987) Chinese Philosophy and Contemporary Human Communication Theory. Communication Theory: Eastern and Western Perspectives. San Diago: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers.
Chung-Ying, Cheng. (1991) Confucian and Neo Confucian Philosophy. Albany, New York: The State University of New York Press.
Danesi, Marcel. (2010) Semiotics of Media and Culture. The Routledge Companion to Semiotics. (Cobley, Paul. Edit.). London: Routledge Publishing.
Dewey, John. (1980) Art as Experience. New York: Perigee Books.
Dewey, John. (1929) Experience in Nature. London: George Allen & Unwin, LTD.
Dewey, John. (2008) Later Works Volume 2: 1925-1927. (Boydston, Jo Ann, Edit.). Carbondale, Illinois: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dosse, François. (1997) History of Structuralism: The rising sign, 1945-1966. (Glassman, Deborah. Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press.
Leibniz, Gottfried. (2008) Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz: The Art of Controversies. (Dascal, Marcelo. Trans. & Edit.). Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Giddens, Anthony. (1991) The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Giddens, Anthony. (1984) The Constitution of Society. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Grange, Joseph. (2004) John Dewey, Confucius, and Global Philosophy. Albany, New York: The State University of New York Press.
Guyer, Paul. Beauty, Freedom and Morality: Kant’s Lectures on Anthropology and the Development of His Aesthetic Theory. Essays on Kant’s Anthropology. (Jacobs, Brain. Edit.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Fei, Xiaotong. (2002) Policy in the Service of Minorities. The Dynamics of Applied Anthropology in the Twentieth Century: The Malinowski Award Papers. (Weaver, Thomas. Edit.). Oklahoma: The Society of Applied Anthropology.
Gunaratne, Shelton. (2005) Public Diplomacy, Global Communication and World Order: An Analysis Based on Theory of Living Systems. Current Sociology. Volume 53, Number 5, 749-772.
Habermas, Jürgen. (1976) Communication and the Evolution of Society. (McCarthy, Thomas. Edit.). Boston: Beacon Press.
Hartley, John. (1982) Understanding News Media. Understanding News: Studies in Culture and Communications. (Fiske. John. Edit.). London, Routledge Publishing, viii.
Hsin, Kwan-chue. (2006) Confucian and Western Aesthetics: A Brief Comparative Study. The Pursuit of Comparative Aesthetics. (Hussein, Mazhar. & Wilkinson, Robert. Edits.). England: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Huntington, Samuel. (1996) The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of the World Order. New York: Simon and Schuster Publishers, 22.
Kant, Immanuel. (1996) Critique of Pure Reason. (Pluhar, Werner. Trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.
Kim, Sungmoon. (2014) Confucian Democracy in East Asia. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lai To Lee, Hock Guan Lee. (2011) Sun Yat-Sen, Nanyang, and the 1911 Revolution. Singapore: ISEAS Publications.
Leibniz, Gottfried. (2004) Leibniz Correspondence with Giovanni Laureati, Rome, November 12, 1689. Leibniz and China: A Correspondence of Light (Perkins, Franklin. Author). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Li, Zehou. (2010) The Chinese Aesthetic Tradition. (Samei, Maija. Trans.). Hawai‘i: The University of Hawai’i Press.
Linklater, Andrew. (2009) Human Interconnectedness. International Relations. Volume 23, Number 3, 482 (Linklater is paraphrasing Elias 2007, 142 & 152).
Mannheim, Karl. (1954) Ideology and Utopia: An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co., Inc.
McLuhan, Marshall, & McLuhan, Eric. (1988) Laws of Media: The New Science. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Needham, Joseph. (1956) Science and Civilization in China. (volume 2). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Miller, Leon. (2013) Complementarity, Pragmatism, and Resolving Western Civilization’s Continental Divide. Sociology of Science and Technology. Volume 4, Number 4, 144-160.
Peirce, Charles. (1891) The Architecture of Theories. The Monist. Volume 1, Number 2, 161-176.
Petrilli, Susan. (2013) The Self as a Sign, the World, and the Other: Living Semiotics.
New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
Ray, Lary. (2007) Globalization and Everyday Life: the new sociology. Oxon, UK: Routledge Publishing.
Sebeok, T. A. (2001) Global Semiotics. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.
Shiller, Friedrich. (2005) Letter Upon the Aesthetic Education of Man. Raleigh, North Carolina: Hayes Barton Press Publisher.
Xiao, Xiaosui. (2002) The Rhetorical Construction of the Discourse on the Dao in Daode jing. Intercultural Communication Studies XI-1, 137-151.
LicenseAuthors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).